K12 Tutoring B2B · Competitive Analysis Pack

Competitive Analysis, Edition 1

What the public record and our own records show about K12 Tutoring's district bids, wins, pricing and competitors. Facts and data-supported trends only; every figure carries its sample size, window and confidence.

As of 2026-10-16 · Core window = solicitations posted 2025-07-01 or later · Confidence: H primary document, M secondary or internal record, L inference

15
core-window bids (RFI responses excluded): 5 won, 4 lost, 5 pending, 1 unknown
1 confirmed by a primary document (ESC 19 26-7543); 14 from the Sales bid log, FY25-26 (M)
9 of 123–137
strict-match tutoring RFPs on the master list had a K12 bid (6.6%–7.3%)
The master list omits co-op solicitations; the 137 upper bound could not be reproduced (M)
1 of 11
recorded wins shows purchase orders in GovSpend: Chesterfield, $1,131,178.82
Chesterfield is a Vehicle-class contract (no committed value). 4 new wins: revenue not verifiable

Price position: K12 vs the virtual market median

June 2026 RFP/Enterprise rate per student-hour against the vendor-weighted median, by group size. The gap below the median narrows from 1:3 to 1:5, where the two are level.

K12 RFP/Enterprise rate Market median (all vendors in rate card) Market median excl. Tutorfly (closed) and Varsity (winding down)

Band A+B pricing (58 of 59 virtual bid rows are Band B: quoted before 2026 and still in force). Vendors per format: 17, 7, 10, 6, 8. One vendor can move any of these medians. K12's $0–50K tier is $65 at 1:1, $32.50 at 1:2 and $25 at 1:3 to 1:5. Source: 02 rate card, K12 vs Market; memo Appendix B. Confidence M.

Table view
FormatK12 RFPMedian (02)Median excl. exitedK12 vs median
1:1$60.00$65.00 (n=17)$65.00 (n=15)−7.7%
1:2$30.00$50.50 (n=7)$50.50 (n=7)−40.6%
1:3$20.00$29.16 (n=10)$35.83 (n=8)−31.4% (−44.2%)
1:4$20.00$20.31 (n=6)$20.62 (n=5)−1.5% (−3.0%)
1:5$20.00$19.50 (n=8)$20.00 (n=7)+2.6% (0%)

Vendors priced below K12 at 1:3 ($20.00)

Littera$16.33Richmond, Band B
Tutorfly$17.67ESC 19; closed 2025-06-27
HeyTutor$18.33ESC 19; acquired by ESS 2026-09-16

3 of 10 vendors; 2 of 8 excluding exited vendors.

Vendors priced below K12 at 1:5 ($20.00)

HeyTutor$12.00
Varsity$12.31winding down
Studentnest$14.00
Tutored by Teachers$19.00only 2026 bid rate on record

4 of 8 vendors.

Core-window bids

15 bids on solicitations posted 2025-07-01 or later. Outcome and the source that records each bid.

Won Lost Pending Unknown
Procurement typeBidsWonLostPendingUnknown
Co-op contract11000
Multi-award RFP20110
Bench / pre-qualified pool21010
Type not documented103331

13 further core rows show K12 involvement with no submission record. RFI responses (Baltimore County; Charlotte-Mecklenburg, pre-window) are not counted. Source: 01 bid ledger, Sales bid log reconciliation. Confidence M (H for ESC 19).

Wins and revenue realized, by award type

Many awards are vehicles: co-op contracts, pools and multi-award lists that give a vendor the right to sell to districts, with no dollar value committed. They are counted separately from awards with a committed value.

Award typeWinsRevenue realized (GovSpend POs)Wins
Vehicle
no committed value
7$1,131,178.82
all Chesterfield; nothing after 2025-07-30
Core: ESC 19 ($0, coverage confirmed), Fresno (not verifiable). Pre-FY26: Chesterfield; Region One, Christina (M), LAUSD, Broward at $0 with coverage confirmed
Funded award1Not verifiableMarvell-Elaine (Core), classed on its Sales log value only (M)
Unknown3Not verifiableHillsborough, Albuquerque (Core); Baltimore City (Pre-FY26)

11 wins: 5 Core, 6 Pre-FY26. Pre-FY26 rows were included because they appeared in earlier records, so they are not a win rate. The four new Core wins sit after the end of GovSpend's spending coverage for each agency, or outside it. Source: 01 bid ledger, POs since award and award-type notes.

Competitors

Bids K12 lost where a profiled competitor was an awardee, and documented changes among competitors.

CompetitorBids won that K12 lostScores in handDocumented change
Littera3: Freehold (Core), Richmond, UF LastingerNone for LitteraRaised $11.8M (2025-08-28); launched Lumen (2026-01-28)
Brainfuse3: Orange County (primary document); Washington Borough, Cherry Hill (March deck, M)98.5 vs K12 90; 83.75 vs 61.13 (deck, M)NSSA design badge (2025-09-16)
Catapult2: Richmond, Orange CountyNoneAnnounced virtual delivery (2026-03-25); no virtual rate on record
HeyTutor1: Orange CountyNoneAcquired by ESS (2026-09-16)
VarsityRichmond, Fort Bend (deck only, M)NoneWind-down committed 2026-07-31 (10-Q, H)
TutorflyNone foundNoneClosed effective 2025-06-27

7 lost bids with a named profiled winner: 1 Core, 4 Pre-FY26, 2 window unknown. A scored win by Littera, Tutorfly or HeyTutor over K12 is not established as of 2026-10-12. Missouri's literacy provider list names 13 awardees; K12 is not among them. Source: 01 bid ledger; 04 competitor profiles.

What districts weight

Median weight of each criterion across the 17 weighted RFPs read, of 30 core-window solicitations sampled. Label shows how many of the 17 include it.

Weights verified against source documents (H). 25 of 30 solicitations read were posted in 2026; unreadable documents cluster in Jul–Sep 2025. Reported as "x of 30 read", not as a share of the market. Source: 03 capability matrix, Criteria Sources CS-01 to CS-30.

RequirementIn solicitations readK12 as documented
In-person deliveryRequired, primary or default in 9 of 30Virtual only (M)
Certified teachersRequired in 5 of 30Led by certified teachers (M)
In-state referencesRequired or scored in 4 of 30Not documented
Progress reporting2 of 17 weighted, 10–15%Not documented
Implementation plan2 of 17 weightedNot documented
Family engagementScored in 2 of 30School or teacher responsibility (M)
Assessment integrationSub-item in 1 of 17; iReady named in 0 of 30SSO / rostering only (M)

What changed since the March 2026 deck

March deck or earlier recordWhat this edition documentsConf.
K12 "roughly 2x" market price at 1:3 ($30 vs Littera $13, Brainfuse $18)The deck used K12's prior $30. At the June 2026 RFP tier, K12 is 31.4% below the 1:3 medianM
25 bids, 8 wonThe deck names 10 bids. The ledger now holds 47 rows; 15 core-window bids; 11 wins carry a revenue checkM
Christina a single award21 vendors on Delaware contract 7085 / CHR25004H
Littera $13 at 1:3$13 is an expired Dec 2023 response; the in-force rate is $16.33 (Richmond)H
Freehold "does not integrate with iReady" read as a Littera pointThe evaluator text refers to K12M
Tutorfly, HeyTutor, Varsity profiled as activeTutorfly closed 2025-06-27; HeyTutor acquired 2026-09-16; Varsity wind-down committed 2026-07-31H / M

Open questions and what we can't see

Data that would answer open questions

  • Award documents and committed values for Hillsborough, Albuquerque, Fresno and Marvell-Elaine (Sales)
  • Revenue billed on the four new wins, and at Baltimore City (Finance)
  • Score sheets for Freehold, Greenville, Fort Bend, Twin Rivers, Washington Borough, Cherry Hill, Orange County (Sales)
  • Submission records for 13 core rows with no Sales log entry (Sales)
  • Solicitation numbers for Pittsburg USD, Marvell-Elaine, VASS, Indiana Learns, Louisiana EIR, and the Region 1 RFQ (Sales)
  • Progress reporting, bilingual materials, implementation plan, in-state references (Product, Sales)

Outside the evidence

  • Bids never seen; co-op solicitations the master list omits
  • Scores districts don't publish, including per-vendor scores on most of our wins
  • Award documents naming K12 for 14 of 15 core bids
  • Revenue outside GovSpend coverage; LAUSD records bench POs at $1
  • Jul–Sep 2025 solicitations, which cluster among unreadable documents
  • Off-paper competitor pricing and competitor capabilities absent from procurement records